Employment Litigation ยท Primary-source case analysis

Naranjo: Meal-and-Rest Premium Pay Is Wages for Final-Pay and Wage-Statement Rules

Decision: Supreme Court of California, S258966, decided May 23, 2022. Document: Published California Supreme Court opinion.

Naranjo resolves the derivative payroll consequences of premiums owed when an employer fails to provide compliant meal or rest periods.

Guards alleged missed off-duty breaks

A class of security guards challenged on-duty meal practices and sought section 226.7 premiums together with waiting-time and wage-statement remedies.

Premiums compensate work as well as the violation

Although the additional hour remedies a denied break, it also compensates the employee for work performed during that period. The payment therefore falls within the Labor Code concept of wages.

Wage status triggers related obligations

Unpaid premiums can support final-pay remedies under section 203 and must be listed on wage statements under section 226 when the statutory mental-state requirements for those penalties are satisfied.

Disposition and interest

The court reversed the contrary wage classification and held that the seven-percent constitutional default rate governed prejudgment interest. Later proceedings remained necessary on derivative penalty elements.

Key takeaways

Discuss the procedural record

Mission X Trial Lawyers represents clients in California. Call (949) 343-9735 or email office@mcxlegal.com.